Skip to content

menu

Crowell & Moring LLP logo
HomeAboutOur TeamContact

Data Law Insights

Legal insights on navigating privacy, data protection, cybersecurity, information governance, and e-discovery

Home » Oregon Passes IoT Security Law

Oregon Passes IoT Security Law

By Cheryl A. Falvey, Kate M. Growley, CIPP/G, CIPP/US & Lee Matheson CIPP/US, CIPP/E, CIPP/A, CIPM on June 12, 2019
Posted in Cybersecurity / Data Security, Internet of Things, Rules

Oregon has recently passed a new cybersecurity statute, joining California in requiring manufacturers of “connected devices” to equip qualifying technology with “reasonable security features.” The new law will go into force on January 1, 2020. For further analysis, visit our recent client alert.

Tags: IoT, security
Print:
EmailTweetLikeLinkedIn
Photo of Cheryl A. Falvey Cheryl A. Falvey
Read more about Cheryl A. Falvey
Photo of Kate M. Growley, CIPP/G, CIPP/US Kate M. Growley, CIPP/G, CIPP/US
Read more about Kate M. Growley, CIPP/G, CIPP/US
Photo of Lee Matheson CIPP/US, CIPP/E, CIPP/A, CIPM Lee Matheson CIPP/US, CIPP/E, CIPP/A, CIPM
Read more about Lee Matheson CIPP/US, CIPP/E, CIPP/A, CIPM
Related Posts
  • Seventh Circuit Wades into Big Data Case Law
  • NIST Surveys and Assesses Broad Landscape of IoT Cybersecurity Standards in Interagency Report
  • New Internet of Things (IoT) NIST Draft Publication Provides Welcomed Guidance
  • FTC Submits Public Comment to Working Group Tasked with Developing Guidance on IoT Security, Upgradability, and Patching
  • Nevada Enacts Internet Privacy Regulation

Subscribe to this blog by email

Coronavirus Webinar Series

We are hosting a series of webinars on COVID-19 scenario planning and the potential business and legal impact of a new Administration.

Blog Authors Show/Hide

  • Laura Aradi
  • Lauren B. Aronson
  • Charles Baek
  • Jonathan M. Baker
  • Bryan Brewer
  • Judith Bussé
  • Stephen M. Byers
  • Deborah A. Carpentier
  • George Carry
  • Christopher A. Cole
  • Michelle Coleman
  • Jodi G. Daniel
  • John Davis
  • Thomas De Meese
  • Cheryl A. Falvey
  • Laura Foggan
  • John Fuson
  • Christopher D. Garcia
  • Brandon C. Ge
  • Lindsay Green
  • Kate M. Growley, CIPP/G, CIPP/US
  • Michael G. Gruden, CIPP/G
  • Derek Hahn
  • David C. Hammond
  • Thomas Hanusik
  • Halie Kaplan
  • Justin Kingsolver
  • Emily T. Kuwahara
  • Maida Oringher Lerner
  • Mara Lieber
  • Mike Lieberman
  • Olivia Lynch
  • Laurel Pyke Malson
  • Lee Matheson CIPP/US, CIPP/E, CIPP/A, CIPM
  • Skye Mathieson
  • Paul Mathis
  • Genevieve Moreland
  • Amber Mulcare
  • John Nakoneczny
  • Tyler A. O'Connor
  • Catherine O'Rourke
  • Nicole Owren-Wiest
  • Jeffrey L. Poston
  • Gabriel M. Ramsey
  • Jennifer S. Romano
  • Paul M. Rosen
  • Shelley Rosenberg
  • Danielle Rowan
  • Barbara H. Ryland
  • Chahira Solh
  • Maarten Stassen
  • Da’Net Sturdifen
  • Jeane A. Thomas
  • Michael G. Van Arsdall
  • Frederik Van Remoortel
  • Kate Watkins
  • Matthew B. Welling
  • Evan D. Wolff
  • Dj Wolff
  • Nathanial J. Wood
  • Clifford J. Zatz
  • Daniel Zelenko
  • Luke van Houwelingen

Stay Connected

RSS Twitter LinkedIn

Subscribe to this blog

Topics

  • Accessibility
  • Admissibility
  • Advertising & Product Risk Management
  • CCPA
  • Cloud Computing
  • Cooperation/Meet & Confer
  • Criminal Law
  • Cybersecurity / Data Security
  • Data Breach
  • Ethics
  • GDPR
  • Government Agencies
  • Government Contracting
  • Government Regulations & FISMA
  • Health IT
  • Information Management
  • Insurance
  • Internet of Things
  • Litigation
  • Mobile Devices & Data
  • Preservation
  • Privacy
  • Privilege/Rule 502
  • Product Liability & Torts
  • Proportionality
  • Public Sectors
  • Rules
  • Sanctions
  • Social Media
  • Spoliation
  • Technology Assisted Review
  • Transnational Discovery
  • Uncategorized

Archives

Recent Updates

  • California Approves Final CCPA Regulations
  • The Three C’s to Mitigate Preservation Risks in a Remote Work Environment (Collaboration, Communication, and Compliance)
  • How to Limit Litigation Risk from the Increased Use of Chat Programs During the COVID-19 Pandemic
  • “Authorized Access”: The Supreme Court’s First Foray Into The Computer Fraud And Abuse Act
  • Best Practices for Navigating Discovery of Mobile Data and Alternative Communication Tools in Today’s Digital World

Data Law Insights

Legal insights on navigating privacy, data protection, cybersecurity, information governance, and e-discovery

Crowell & Moring LLP logo
RSS Twitter LinkedIn
Privacy PolicyDisclaimer

About Data Law Insights

Welcome to our Data Law Insights blog, CrowellDataLaw.com. We focus on a broad spectrum of privacy, e-discovery, cybersecurity, data protection, and information governance issues. Our goal is to provide fresh insights not just on where the law has gone, with new decisions, new laws, new rules, trends, and other developments, but also on where the law looks to be going and where it should go, at least in our view. We bring deep knowledge of standards and principles emerging from the courts, government agencies, and other authorities and integrate our litigation, antitrust, white collar, health care, government contracts, labor and employment, intellectual property, and corporate capabilities to address the most relevant, important, and practical issues, policies, and strategies.

Copyright © 2021, Crowell & Moring LLP. All Rights Reserved.
Powered By LexBlog